Concurrent VS Static

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode is OFF
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Concurrent VS Static

Re: Concurrent VS Static

by aka » Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:34 pm

cobash wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:36 pm If you use concurrent and one day the internet is down and the device is rebooted will it cache the license it had for a while
Concurrent - no. Not cached.

Static - yes, static license is "cached" forever in config file. Internet not needed for static license.

cobash wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:36 pm or will it say it is not licensed anymore until the internet comes back up?
Concurrent will say it is not licensed until the internet comes back up.
cobash wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:36 pm If I generate a static license for the Ethernet port and then decide I want to use the wireless card will the licensing still work?
Static - no. License should be generated for card that works now. Terminal uses only one card and does not run drivers for another.

Concurrent - yes, after few days requires to renew. Or immediately if you have another unused license, and concurrent license generated for Ethernet becomes free after few days without using it.

Concurrent VS Static

by cobash » Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:36 pm

Hello!

I am trying to figure out what the best type of license to use is.

Are there pros/cons to one or the other?


If you use concurrent and one day the internet is down and the device is rebooted will it cache the license it had for a while or will it say it is not licensed anymore until the internet comes back up?


If I generate a static license for the ethernet port and then decide I want to use the wireless card will the licensing still work?

Top