5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Problems with video cards. Screen frequency refresh. Terminal speed.
aka
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:05 pm
Contact:

5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby aka » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:07 pm

Unlike "RemoteFX" buzzword, that appears everywhere, Microsoft didn't invent any buzzword for this graphic codec. This codec is fantastic. Microsoft finished lossy codec from RemoteFX for photo/video, added cashes and lossless codec, that were not included in RemoteFX.

Codec is embedded into 2012R2 and Windows 10. It's turned on by default, no need to specially turn on anything. Whether it works or not - depends on the client.

If WTware starts with this codec you'll se in the log:

Untitled.png
Untitled.png (23.57 KiB) Viewed 1260 times


One tile thread runs for each processor kernel.

In addition: in 5.4.58 new graphics is turned on for x86 and uefi. It won't work for old processors without SSE. Color depth bpp=32 бита is now by default, unless another value is specified in config. For old x86 computers and to work with 2008 server, i.e. where there's no new graphics, it's better to specify bpp=16 in config.

With new graphics even Pi 2 shows youtube in browser default size smoothly. Photo view also became more smooth.

If new codec runs, WTware automatically turns on font smoothing and Desktop Composition (graphic=fg).

With this codec difference between 16- and 32-bit color became significant. With 16-bit color - looks bad, steps and twitches on smooth gradients in video. And a problem appeared: very clever codec sometimes slightly changes background color for text pieces. In browsers you may see areas with a little different background color. That's why by default 32-bit color is set. Slightly slower, but nice. Color depth on Raspberry may be changed in config.txt on SD.

Full-screen video on Raspberry is still slow. And it's not comfortable: it slowly reacts to keyboard/mouse. Heavily loaded by big video playback queues on server and in WTware become full. WTware immediately send command for mouse key click to server and server immediately executes it. But result will be shown on the screen only when command queues will be empty and executed. We saw lags up to 3 seconds. Right now I see no ways how to fix it. Just don't hurry, while watching big video on the screen.

Sound sometimes fails. Will be fixed. When processes will calm down, sound works ok, but at new video start several times it will click.

J1mbo
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:24 pm

Re: 5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby J1mbo » Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:09 pm

Very excited by this, excellent!

Pi3 and Win2016

Re: 5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby Pi3 and Win2016 » Wed Feb 08, 2017 1:55 pm

Will full screen video work nice on Pi3 in combination with Windows 2016 server?
I tested Pi2 but fullscreen video is not fluent. Sound is a little out of sync.

aka
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: 5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby aka » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:36 pm

Full screen video will NEVER be nice on thin client. WTware plays youtube in RDP session on Raspberry at quarter of screen, and I think it's amazing.

Wouwie

Re: 5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby Wouwie » Wed Feb 08, 2017 6:43 pm

I don't quite understand.
Raspberry Pi2 with Kodi plays movies in HD on 40" TV's like a charm.

Internet RDP connection from Win2016 on Proliant DL360 server without special graphic card to Win10 on 8 year old PC with onboard graphics plays full screen 1080p youtube movies pretty good.
Could be better with remote FX and quardro card in server.

So, why will thin client never be able to play full screen video nicely?

aka
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Posts: 479
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:05 pm
Contact:

Re: 5.4.54-5.4.62 - new graphics for 2012R2

Postby aka » Fri Feb 10, 2017 10:45 am

Here are videos:
http://download.blender.org/peach/bigbu ... p_h264.mov
http://download.blender.org/peach/bigbu ... p_h264.mov
http://download.blender.org/peach/bigbu ... p_h264.mov
Run internet RDP session with 1920x1080 resolution.
Open videos in media player in RDP session, maximize video window to full screen.
Do you see difference between image quality of these three videos?
Then run 1080p locally, not in RDP. Do you see difference between 1080p in RDP and 1080p locally?
Then run 480p locally, not in RDP. Which image quality is better - 480p locally or 1080p over RDP?


Return to “Video cards and speed”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest